Common Sense Notions of Political Action and Power Essay

Common Sense Notions of Political Action and Power - Es interpret Exampleg whether it be on certain issues or the election of a representative, starting a petition on a certain issue, sending a content through social media, or participating in a committee. Therefore, taking these definitions and examples into account it would be safe for us to assume that there be cardinal concourses of people involved in the political action process. The first group is the one that is seeking to send out a message and the second group is the one who will receive the message. In fact, according to Micheal Kaulbars (2009), a trained research biologist who is very active on environmental and social arbitrator issues, the standard model of political struggle includes two groups the activists and the target. In this model he describes the activists as the group of people who use protests, petitions, hunger strikes, and other forms of bell ringing techniques to directly influence their targets behavi or. The target in response to these actions creates counter groups and media campaigns to influence the activists behavior. Kaulbars (2009) criticizes this model of political action as being too simplified. In fact, this standard model is a perfect description of the common sense notions surrounding political action. According to him, this model is self-defeating at explaining political action because the activists described rarely have enough power to make a difference. Hence, now that we know a little to a greater extent about political action we must analyze what part it may play in the running of an organization? In fact in lay out to understand an organization we must look at it as a political system (Management Consulting Courses, n.d). To elaborate on this further we must redefine government in relation to an organization. In an organization, politics are a means to recognize and reconcile conflicting interests between individuals. This makes sense as organizations especia lly intumescent ones are made up of a number of very diverse individuals which will no doubt translate into diversity in interests and agendas. Hence, it is safe to say that organizations create an environment that is perfect for political action. In fact, according to Ammeter et al., (2002), there are three basic levels of political action in organizations individual, coalition and network. At the individual level leadership try to influence individuals in the organization through one-on-one relationships. Furthermore, at the coalition level, coalitions are formed by leaders through convincing peers, subordinates and other members in the organization to join a force in order to pursue common interests. Lastly, in the network level, individuals and groups are tied together into an interconnected system. Therefore, we may look at the networking level as a result of the individual and the coalition level. First individuals are influenced which leads to the defining of groups eventu ally leading to the formation of a network. To elaborate further on political action